Researchers propose new framework to value DeFi projects


Identifying the DeFi-equivalent to the Black-Scholes model might be the key to DeFi’s mass adoption, says author
A new crypto research paper, released last week, was aimed at identifying the “Black-Scholes of decentralised finance (DeFi)”. Authored by Guillermo Angeris, Alex Evans and Tarun Chitra, the paper attempted to conceptualise an equation to enable investors and users to accurately value DeFi projects and comprehend potential profit/loss metrics in popular DeFi verticals such as liquidity mining.
Liquidity mining refers to the process of rewarding users with trading fees or governance tokens, often denominated in APY percentages in exchange for providing liquidity to automated market makers like Uniswap.
However, users often suffer from “impermanent losses” due to fluctuations in the demand for a trading pair and a simple APY calculation on a user interface has proven to be insufficient to accurately determine what the gains might look like for liquidity providers. The paper aims to develop a framework to solve this issue.
Titled “When does the tail wag the dog? Curvature and market-making”, the paper states that liquidity mining is best thought of as a complex derivative. One of the authors and the founder and CEO of DeFi risk analysis firm Gauntlet, Tarun Chitra, explained the thought behind the research paper to CoinTelegraph.
“Most passive investment products often have non-trivial derivatives-like exposure. For instance, the collapse of the ETF XIV in February 2018 illustrated how some assets that are passive and safe have complex exposure”, Chitra explained.
“Liquidity providing in AMMs is not so different, although it presents a new set of risks to holders. Liquidity providers are always balancing fees earned (positive income) with large price moves losses (negative, impermanent loss)”, he elaborated.
“Such complexities on the system have caused the failure of liquidity mining projects either due to over-incentivisation or under-incentivisation. Therefore, it is imperative that users and developers think of farming as complex derivatives analog of maker-taker incentives on centralised exchanges”, Chitra stated.
The conceptual model proposed in the paper is aimed at enabling more sophisticated decision making from liquidity providers, while also contributing to a more robust architectural framework for AMM developers.
“APY only makes sense for fixed income assets (bonds), whereas derivative pricing makes MUCH more sense for something like liquidity provision. We hope this is the first in the line of many works that try to find the ‘Black-Scholes of DeFi’”, Chitra explained.
He further added that finding a DeFi-equivalent to the Black-Scholes model might be the key to DeFi’s mass adoption. Black-Scholes was a 1980s model that helped investors find ways to properly price stock options, thus leading to a massive boom in derivatives trading.
Keep updated with our round the clock and in-depth cryptocurrency news.
Unsub anytime
No SPAM ever!
After signing up, you may also receive occasional special offers from us via email. We will never sell or distribute your data to any third parties. View our privacy policy here.
Please be aware that some of the links on this site will direct you to the websites of third parties, some of whom are marketing affiliates and/or business partners of this site and/or its owners, operators and affiliates. We may receive financial compensation from these third parties. Notwithstanding any such relationship, no responsibility is accepted for the conduct of any third party nor the content or functionality of their websites or applications. A hyperlink to or positive reference to or review of a broker or exchange should not be understood to be an endorsement of that broker or exchange’s products or services.
Risk Warning: Investing in digital currencies, stocks, shares and other securities, commodities, currencies and other derivative investment products (e.g. contracts for difference (“CFDs”) is speculative and carries a high level of risk. Each investment is unique and involves unique risks.
CFDs and other derivatives are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. You should consider whether you understand how an investment works and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Cryptocurrencies can fluctuate widely in prices and are, therefore, not appropriate for all investors. Trading cryptocurrencies is not supervised by any EU regulatory framework. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Any trading history presented is less than 5 years old unless otherwise stated and may not suffice as a basis for investment decisions. Your capital is at risk.
When trading in stocks your capital is at risk.
Past performance is not an indication of future results. Trading history presented is less than 5 years old unless otherwise stated and may not suffice as a basis for investment decisions. Prices may go down as well as up, prices can fluctuate widely, you may be exposed to currency exchange rate fluctuations and you may lose all of or more than the amount you invest. Investing is not suitable for everyone; ensure that you have fully understood the risks and legalities involved. If you are unsure, seek independent financial, legal, tax and/or accounting advice. This website does not provide investment, financial, legal, tax or accounting advice. Some links are affiliate links. For more information please read our full risk warning and disclaimer.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous Post

CBOE to re-enter the Bitcoin derivative game by acquiring ErisX

Next Post

Stripe now hiring a crypto team years after ending BTC support

Related Posts